Particular: Gravity over time?

Audio production, MS paint, Call of Duty, etc

Particular: Gravity over time?

Postby varxtis on 01/27/2017, 3:02 pm

Is there a way to animate the Gravity of the particles over life where gravity is low, so the particles rise up, but then the gravity rises as they reach the end of their life? Keyframing Gravity itself, or using "Physics over time" effects all particles, whether just emitted or at the end of their life span.
If you think of it like a ceiling. Everything rising like smoke, but then the smoke/particles (no, Im not making smoke, but was the closest analogy I can think of) reach the ceiling and accumulate there.


Answer Found:
I was phrasing the question wrong, or maybe better yet, approaching it all wrong. I Searched "after effects particular control speed of particles over life"
It came back with https://www.reddit.com/r/AfterEffects/c ... _question/
You play with the air and velocity instead of gravity :) Hope this helps someone else.
The only problem this still doesn't solve is if you're needing to emit a constant stream of particles that go up, and then down like on a water fountain or something.
Last edited by varxtis on 02/5/2017, 1:31 am, edited 1 time in total.
varxtis
 
Posts: 140
Joined: 01/3/2010, 9:28 pm

Re: Particular: Gravity over time?

Postby JPT7505 on 01/27/2017, 6:21 pm

try using the following expression in gravity.

time*'number' replace number with an actual number and the effect will be compounded over time.
JPT7505
 
Posts: 722
Joined: 02/9/2011, 8:17 am

Re: Particular: Gravity over time?

Postby varxtis on 01/28/2017, 9:53 am

First off, thank you for your time and response.
Let me try this, and Ill let you know. I feel like this will impact the layer as a whole, and not effect the characteristics of the independent particles over their lifespan.
varxtis
 
Posts: 140
Joined: 01/3/2010, 9:28 pm

Re: Particular: Gravity over time?

Postby varxtis on 01/28/2017, 1:13 pm

I got a chance to try out your expression and Im confused. So, initially it was just an assumption that keyframing "Gravity" under the physics tab would effect the particals as a whole, as a layer. But when I went to try out your expression, it occured to me that "Gravity" doesn't allow for key framing. or am I missing something?
varxtis
 
Posts: 140
Joined: 01/3/2010, 9:28 pm

Re: Particular: Gravity over time?

Postby JPT7505 on 01/28/2017, 5:46 pm

I kinda had that thought in my head but I wasn't sure, sorry!

Maybe some sort of aux or bounce I dont know. You may have to resort to a 3d particle system in a dedicated program. Good luck
JPT7505
 
Posts: 722
Joined: 02/9/2011, 8:17 am

Re: Particular: Gravity over time?

Postby varxtis on 02/2/2017, 9:39 am

Still haven't any fix to the the gravity issue, but I had a thought. Is there a was to control the speed/time of a section of a layer with a mask and some sort of gradient ramp?
Also, Im rendering what I have so far. Definitely not done, but its close. One problem I can't seem to get right though is how to make the form layer not so symmetrical with its dots. They are in straight lines. Is there a way to scatter them a bit. I've messed around with every parameter/setting, and nothing.
varxtis
 
Posts: 140
Joined: 01/3/2010, 9:28 pm


Return to Other Software & Tools