<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AE CS5 64 bit only</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.videocopilot.net/blog/2009/10/ae-cs5-64-bit-only/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.videocopilot.net/blog/2009/10/ae-cs5-64-bit-only/</link>
	<description>A Blog by Andrew Kramer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 04:01:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: dwg</title>
		<link>http://www.videocopilot.net/blog/2009/10/ae-cs5-64-bit-only/#comment-225343</link>
		<dc:creator>dwg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2010 00:54:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.videocopilot.net/blog/?p=1653#comment-225343</guid>
		<description>I have so much legacy software than periodically that doesn&#039;t run on Win7, that Adobe and MS not supporting a backward compatible system is a royal pain in the arse with no clear solution other than running two systems side-by-side.

Shouldn&#039;t Adobe and MS listen to people in the field before they make rash decisions!!!  Or does this kind of stuff come from marketing considerations rather than crafting the best production tool to fit real needs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have so much legacy software than periodically that doesn&#8217;t run on Win7, that Adobe and MS not supporting a backward compatible system is a royal pain in the arse with no clear solution other than running two systems side-by-side.</p>
<p>Shouldn&#8217;t Adobe and MS listen to people in the field before they make rash decisions!!!  Or does this kind of stuff come from marketing considerations rather than crafting the best production tool to fit real needs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sam</title>
		<link>http://www.videocopilot.net/blog/2009/10/ae-cs5-64-bit-only/#comment-211962</link>
		<dc:creator>sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 07:30:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.videocopilot.net/blog/?p=1653#comment-211962</guid>
		<description>hay every buddy i have free site for this plugin twich 25mb, action essentials 72parts download..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hay every buddy i have free site for this plugin twich 25mb, action essentials 72parts download..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IMY</title>
		<link>http://www.videocopilot.net/blog/2009/10/ae-cs5-64-bit-only/#comment-211960</link>
		<dc:creator>IMY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 07:21:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.videocopilot.net/blog/?p=1653#comment-211960</guid>
		<description>PLZ ANDREW GIVE ME FREE SITE AE CS5 DOWNLOAD WITH RESUME CAPIBILITY????????????????PLZ GOD???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PLZ ANDREW GIVE ME FREE SITE AE CS5 DOWNLOAD WITH RESUME CAPIBILITY????????????????PLZ GOD???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paul selhi</title>
		<link>http://www.videocopilot.net/blog/2009/10/ae-cs5-64-bit-only/#comment-210775</link>
		<dc:creator>paul selhi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2010 04:45:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.videocopilot.net/blog/?p=1653#comment-210775</guid>
		<description>Cinema 4d R11 up to R12 has had QT support for 64 bit for some time now. The program loads some sort of 32 bit emulator called qtguiagent.exe which does the magic. I wonder why other apps have not been able to accomplish this seemingly simple task</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cinema 4d R11 up to R12 has had QT support for 64 bit for some time now. The program loads some sort of 32 bit emulator called qtguiagent.exe which does the magic. I wonder why other apps have not been able to accomplish this seemingly simple task</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: doa mara</title>
		<link>http://www.videocopilot.net/blog/2009/10/ae-cs5-64-bit-only/#comment-204744</link>
		<dc:creator>doa mara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2010 23:15:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.videocopilot.net/blog/?p=1653#comment-204744</guid>
		<description>this is just perfect. i made a comp including 15 hd (1920*1080)layer for matrix ripple fx, AE handled it with 6 gb ram easily.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is just perfect. i made a comp including 15 hd (1920*1080)layer for matrix ripple fx, AE handled it with 6 gb ram easily.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabriel Salgado</title>
		<link>http://www.videocopilot.net/blog/2009/10/ae-cs5-64-bit-only/#comment-194289</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabriel Salgado</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 06:40:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.videocopilot.net/blog/?p=1653#comment-194289</guid>
		<description>for a very long time, I didn&#039;t even take advantage of my 64-bit system. I chose to install the 32-bit system, just because of compatibility fears (which turned out to be unfounded). I just recently did a clean install of Windows 7 and decided to take the plunge (and full advantage of all 4 GB of RAM), and I don&#039;t regret it for a moment. I&#039;m serious about using After Effects and using it right, and always being ready to upgrade... but this just goes to show that everyone has moments of trepidation. Come on people, we can do this! :-D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>for a very long time, I didn&#8217;t even take advantage of my 64-bit system. I chose to install the 32-bit system, just because of compatibility fears (which turned out to be unfounded). I just recently did a clean install of Windows 7 and decided to take the plunge (and full advantage of all 4 GB of RAM), and I don&#8217;t regret it for a moment. I&#8217;m serious about using After Effects and using it right, and always being ready to upgrade&#8230; but this just goes to show that everyone has moments of trepidation. Come on people, we can do this! <img src='http://www.videocopilot.net/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':-D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tarrizzzzzzzzz</title>
		<link>http://www.videocopilot.net/blog/2009/10/ae-cs5-64-bit-only/#comment-191882</link>
		<dc:creator>Tarrizzzzzzzzz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 18:32:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.videocopilot.net/blog/?p=1653#comment-191882</guid>
		<description>why can&#039;t i get an official release date anywhere? please e-mail me :S</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why can&#8217;t i get an official release date anywhere? please e-mail me :S</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve (flame/nuke op)</title>
		<link>http://www.videocopilot.net/blog/2009/10/ae-cs5-64-bit-only/#comment-191869</link>
		<dc:creator>steve (flame/nuke op)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 17:18:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.videocopilot.net/blog/?p=1653#comment-191869</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m dissapointed with how little Adobe have moved After Effects forward since even CS3. How about a decent flow-graph/node editor rather than the pointless Schematic View? Or &quot;true&quot; 3D - not the 2.5D Adobe insist on? Or an intuitive graph editor that actually works properly? Until Adobe address fundemental issues like this (rather than just giving away gimicky free plug-ins), After Effects will continue to play second fiddle to products like Nuke/Flame for high-end work. It&#039;s also AFX&#039;s reliance on 3rd party plug-ins that results in so much of the work out there (including on this site I&#039;m afraid to say) looking very &quot;After Effectsy&quot; in my opinion. A case of the software strongly influencing the design.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m dissapointed with how little Adobe have moved After Effects forward since even CS3. How about a decent flow-graph/node editor rather than the pointless Schematic View? Or &#8220;true&#8221; 3D &#8211; not the 2.5D Adobe insist on? Or an intuitive graph editor that actually works properly? Until Adobe address fundemental issues like this (rather than just giving away gimicky free plug-ins), After Effects will continue to play second fiddle to products like Nuke/Flame for high-end work. It&#8217;s also AFX&#8217;s reliance on 3rd party plug-ins that results in so much of the work out there (including on this site I&#8217;m afraid to say) looking very &#8220;After Effectsy&#8221; in my opinion. A case of the software strongly influencing the design.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

